我与原公司某科技有限公司发生竞业限制纠纷，原公司委托第三方公司对我进行调查，最终形成一份八千字的调查

报告，用以证明我违反了竞业限制，并将这份报告邮寄给我。那么，问题来了，这个报告合法吗，最终法院会认可

这份报告吗？

答案是，有可能认可。

现实中，竞业调查公司提交的调查报告在满足一定条件下，法院通常会予以认可。当然，大多需要满足以下条件：

证据合法性：调查报告的内容必须合法获取，不得侵犯他人合法权益或违反法律禁止性规定。例如，如果调查过

程中采用了跟踪拍摄等方式，但这些取证过程是在公共场合完成，没有侵害个人隐私和他人的合法权益，也不违反

社会公共利益和社会公德，那么这样的调查结果是可以作为证据使用的。

证据真实性：调查报告所反映的内容必须是真实存在的，不能有伪造或篡改的情况。当事人对调查报告的真实性通

常需要进行质证，如果对方当事人认可调查报告的真实性，那么该证据就更有可能被法院采纳。

证据关联性：调查报告的内容必须与案件事实具有直接的关联性，能够证明案件的关键事实或争议焦点。

例如，在竞业限制纠纷中，调查报告需要能够证明员工是否违反了竞业限制协议，以及具体的违约行为是什么。

证据形式：调查报告的形式也需要符合法律规定，如书面报告、视频资料等，并且需要有明确的出具单位或个人。

举证责任：在民事诉讼中，当事人对自己提出的主张有责任提供证据。如果企业认为员工违反了竞业限制

协议，那么就需要提供相应的证据来支持自己的主张。调查报告作为其中的一种证据形式，如果能够满足上述条件，

就有可能被法院采纳。

需要注意的是，不同地区的法院在审理案件时可能会持有不同的观点，因此具体的认可情况还需要根据案件的具体情

况和当地的司法实践来判断。此外，企业在进行竞业限制调查时，应确保所有操作均符合法律规定，以避免侵犯个人

隐私和合法权益。

最后，需要强调的是，以上信息仅供参考，并不能替代专业法律意见。在涉及竞业限制纠纷等复杂法律问题时，建议

咨询专业律师以获取准确的法律建议。

专注竞业限制12年，关注我，教你如何破局！

I had a non compete dispute with a certain technology limited company of my original company. The 

original company commissioned a third-party company to investigate me, and finally formed an 8000 

word investigation report to prove that I violated the non compete agreement. The report was mailed 

to me. So, the question is, is this report legal and will the court ultimately recognize it?

The answer is, it is possible to approve.

In reality, the investigation report submitted by a non compete investigation company is usually 

recognized by the court under certain conditions. Of course, most of them need to meet the following 

conditions:

Legitimacy of evidence: The content of the investigation report must be obtained legally and must not 

infringe upon the legitimate rights and interests of others or violate legal prohibitions. For example, if the 

investigation process uses methods such as tracking and filming, but these evidence collection processes 

are completed in public places, without infringing on personal privacy and the legitimate rights and interests 

of others, nor violating social public interests and ethics, then such investigation results can be used as evidence.

Authenticity of evidence: The content reflected in the investigation report must be genuine and cannot be forged 

or tampered with. The authenticity of the investigation report usually requires cross examination by the parties 

involved. If the other party acknowledges the authenticity of the investigation report, then the evidence is more 

likely to be accepted by the court.

Evidence relevance: The content of the investigation report must have a direct correlation with the facts of the 

case, and be able to prove the key facts or controversial points of the case. For example, in non competition 

disputes, the investigation report needs to be able to prove whether the employees have violated the non competition 

agreement and what the specific violations are.

Evidence form: The form of the investigation report also needs to comply with legal regulations, such as written 

reports, video materials, etc., and there needs to be a clear issuing unit or individual.

Burden of proof: In civil litigation, the parties have a responsibility to provide evidence for their claims. If a company 

believes that an employee has violated a non compete agreement, it needs to provide corresponding evidence to 

support its claim. As one of the forms of evidence, if the investigation report can meet the above conditions, it may 

be adopted by the court.

It should be noted that courts in different regions may hold different views when adjudicating cases, so the specific 

recognition situation still needs to be judged based on the specific circumstances of the case and local judicial 

practice. In addition, when conducting non compete investigations, companies should ensure that all operations 

comply with legal regulations to avoid infringing on personal privacy and legitimate rights and interests.

Finally, it should be emphasized that the above information is for reference only and cannot replace professional 

legal advice. When dealing with complex legal issues such as non compete disputes, it is recommended to consult 

a professional lawyer for accurate legal advice.

Focusing on non compete restrictions for 12 years, follow me and teach you how to break through!

------------------------------------------------------------

你可能还会感兴趣的话题：

离职2个月才发竞业限制通知，怎么办？

如何知道离职员工去了哪家公司？

如何调查获取员工违反竞业协议？

很多人跳槽不怕竞业协议吗？

发现前员工违反竞业协议如何取证？

离职时HR说竞业协议不生效？