今天给大家分享一个真实的竞业限制案件，具体情况如下：

案例：某科技公司与前高级工程师竞业限制纠纷案

一、基本案情

公司背景：某科技公司（以下简称“公司”）主要从事软件开发与信息技术服务。公司拥有多项核心技术和商业秘密，对技术人

才的依赖度较高。

员工情况：李某是公司的高级工程师，负责核心软件产品的研发工作。在任职期间，李某与公司签订了劳动合同及竞业限制协议。

离职与入职竞争公司：李某从公司离职后，随即加入了一家与公司业务范围高度重合的竞争对手企业，并担任类似职务。

竞业限制协议内容：根据竞业限制协议，李某在离职后的两年内不得在与公司有竞争关系的企业工作，也不得自行或与他人合作

开展与公司相竞争的业务。

二、公司起诉

公司在得知李某加入竞争对手企业后，认为李某的行为违反了竞业限制协议，遂向法院提起诉讼，要求李某停止违约行为，并赔

偿经济损失及违约金。

三、法院审理

证据提交：公司提交了劳动合同、竞业限制协议、李某在竞争对手企业的任职证明等证据，以证明李某违反了竞业限制协议。

李某辩称：李某辩称竞业限制协议违反了劳动法的相关规定，应属无效；并且自己离职后加入新公司并未违反任何法律规定。

法院判决：法院经审理认为，竞业限制协议是双方真实意思表示，且不违反法律法规的强制性规定，应属有效。李某作为掌握公司

核心技术信息的高级工程师，在离职后加入竞争对手企业，明显违反了竞业限制协议。因此，法院判决李某停止违约行为，并赔偿

公司经济损失及支付违约金。

四、案例分析

竞业限制协议的有效性：本案中，竞业限制协议是双方自愿签订的，且内容不违反法律法规的强制性规定，因此被认定为有效。这提

醒用人单位在制定竞业限制协议时，应确保协议内容合法合规。

违约行为的认定：李某在离职后加入竞争对手企业，直接违反了竞业限制协议中的约定。法院据此认定其行为构成违约，并判决其承

担相应的法律责任。

经济损失与违约金的赔偿：除了要求李某停止违约行为外，公司还要求其赔偿经济损失及支付违约金。这一判决体现了对用人单位合

法权益的保护，同时也对劳动者违反竞业限制协议的行为起到了警示作用。

专注竞业限制12年，关注我，教你如何破局！

Today I will share with you a real non compete case, the specific situation is as follows:

Case: Non compete dispute between a technology company and a former senior engineer

1、 Basic case

Company Background: A technology company (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") mainly engages 

in software development and information technology services. The company has multiple core technologies 

and trade secrets, and has a high dependence on technical talents.

Employee situation: Li is a senior engineer in the company, responsible for the research and development 

of core software products. During his tenure, Li signed a labor contract and non compete agreement with 

the company.

Resignation and entry into competing companies: After leaving the company, Li immediately joined a competitor 

company with a highly overlapping business scope and held similar positions.

The content of the non compete agreement: According to the non compete agreement, Li shall not work in any 

enterprise that competes with the company, nor shall he conduct business that competes with the company on 

his own or in cooperation with others, within two years after leaving the company.

2、 Company lawsuit

After learning that Li had joined a competitor's company, the company believed that Li's behavior violated the non 

compete agreement and filed a lawsuit with the court, demanding that Li stop the breach of contract and compensate 

for economic losses and liquidated damages.

3、 Court trial

Evidence submission: The company submitted evidence such as labor contracts, non compete agreements, and proof 

employment for Li in a competitor's company to prove that Li violated the non compete agreement.

Li argued that the non compete agreement violated relevant provisions of labor law and should be deemed invalid; 

And joining the new company after leaving did not violate any legal regulations.

Court ruling: After trial, the court believes that the non compete agreement is a genuine expression of intention by both 

parties and does not violate mandatory provisions of laws and regulations, and should be valid. Li, as a senior engineer 

who possesses core technical information of the company, joined a competitor company after leaving, which clearly 

violated the non compete agreement. Therefore, the court ruled that Li should cease his breach of contract and compensate 

the company for its economic losses and pay liquidated damages.

4、 Case analysis

Validity of Non compete Agreement: In this case, the non compete agreement was voluntarily signed by both parties and 

its content does not violate mandatory provisions of laws and regulations, therefore it is deemed valid. This reminds 

employers to ensure that the content of the non compete agreement is legal and compliant when formulating it.

Determination of breach of contract: Li joined a competitor company after leaving, directly violating the provisions of 

the non compete agreement. The court determined that his behavior constituted a breach of contract and ruled that 

he should bear corresponding legal responsibilities.

Compensation for economic losses and liquidated damages: In addition to demanding that Li cease his breach of 

contract, the company also requires him to compensate for economic losses and pay liquidated damages. This 

judgment reflects the protection of the legitimate rights and interests of employers, and also serves as a warning 

to employees who violate non compete agreements.

Focusing on non compete restrictions for 12 years, follow me and teach you how to break through!

------------------------------------------------------------

你可能还会感兴趣的话题：

离职2个月才发竞业限制通知，怎么办？

如何知道离职员工去了哪家公司？

如何调查获取员工违反竞业协议？

很多人跳槽不怕竞业协议吗？

发现前员工违反竞业协议如何取证？

离职时HR说竞业协议不生效？