据相关报道，阿里巴巴起诉盖坤违反竞业限制协议一案，北京市朝阳区人民法院已做出一审判决，要求被告盖坤向阿里公司支付

违反竞业限制义务违约金共计200余万元。

在这类案件中，企业通常需要提供证据来证明员工违反了竞业协议。据媒体报道，在类似的竞业纠纷案件中，企业可能会通过多

种方式取证，例如跟踪拍摄员工出入竞争公司办公场所的视频、照片等。在盖坤的案例中，可能也存在类似的证据。

不过，具体到阿里巴巴与盖坤的案件，其证据细节可能并未公开披露。法院在判决时会综合考虑双方提供的证据和陈述，以确定

是否违反竞业协议。

竞业协议的目的是保护企业的商业秘密和竞争优势，防止员工在离职后利用原单位的商业秘密为竞争对手服务。但在实际情况中，

对于证据的认定和责任的划分可能会较为复杂，需要依据具体的法律法规和案件事实来判断。

需要注意的是，即使员工被认定违反竞业协议，也并不意味着企业一定能够获得全额的违约金赔偿。法院会根据具体情况进行酌定，

例如考虑违约金约定是否过高、企业是否能证明实际损失等因素。同时，如果员工对判决结果不服，也可以通过法律途径进行上诉。

如果你想了解关于该案件的更详细信息，建议关注相关的法律渠道或媒体报道。此外，在涉及竞业协议等法律问题时，劳动者和企

业都应当充分了解自身的权利和义务，遵守法律法规和协议约定，以避免不必要的法律纠纷。

According to relevant reports, the People's Court of Chaoyang District, Beijing, has issued a first-instance verdict in

the case where Alibaba sued Gai Kun for violating the non-compete agreement, ordering the defendant Gai Kun to 

pay Alibaba a total penalty of more than 2 million yuan for breaching the non-compete obligations.

In such cases, companies usually need to provide evidence to prove that the employee has violated the non-compete 

agreement. According to media reports, in similar non-compete dispute cases, companies may collect evidence through 

various means, such as tracking and photographing videos, photos, etc. of employees entering and exiting the offices of 

competing companies. Similar evidence may also exist in Gai Kun's case.

However, regarding the specifics of the case between Alibaba and Gai Kun, the details of the evidence may not have been 

publicly disclosed. When making a judgment, the court will comprehensively consider the evidence and statements provided 

by both parties to determine whether the non-compete agreement has been violated.

The purpose of a non-compete agreement is to protect the company's trade secrets and competitive advantages, preventing 

employees from using the former employer's trade secrets to serve competitors after leaving. However, in practical situations, 

the determination of evidence and the division of responsibility can be complex, requiring judgment based on specific laws, 

regulations, and the facts of the case.

It should be noted that even if an employee is deemed to have violated the non-compete agreement, it does not necessarily 

mean that the company will be able to obtain the full amount of penalty compensation. The court will make a discretionary 

judgment based on specific circumstances, such as considering whether the agreed penalty is excessively high and whether 

the company can prove actual losses. At the same time, if the employee is dissatisfied with the judgment, they can appeal 

through legal channels.

If you want to learn more detailed information about this case, it is recommended to follow relevant legal channels or media 

reports. In addition, when dealing with legal issues such as non-compete agreements, both employees and companies should 

fully understand their rights and obligations, comply with laws, regulations, and agreement terms to avoid unnecessary legal 

disputes.

------------------------------------------------------------

你可能还会感兴趣的话题：

离职2个月才发竞业限制通知，怎么办？

如何知道离职员工去了哪家公司？

如何调查获取员工违反竞业协议？

很多人跳槽不怕竞业协议吗？

发现前员工违反竞业协议如何取证？

离职时HR说竞业协议不生效？